Maffia171 said:Tl;dr
GPow69 said:Maffia171 said:Tl;dr
What the fuck does that mean.. I can't even find it D:
Maffia171 said:Tl;dr i5-2500k for gaming. i7-2600k for video/audio or some other heavily multi-thread application
I see what Maffia is saying, and I think it might be a wise investment anyways to get the i7, especially considering you do 3D rendering dont you?Mauri said:Maffia171 said:Tl;dr i5-2500k for gaming. i7-2600k for video/audio or some other heavily multi-thread application
I think I'm going to get i7 anyways, I don't see a reason why I can't play with it.
Vodkush said:I see what Maffia is saying, and I think it might be a wise investment anyways to get the i7, especially considering you do 3D rendering dont you?Mauri said:Maffia171 said:Tl;dr i5-2500k for gaming. i7-2600k for video/audio or some other heavily multi-thread application
I think I'm going to get i7 anyways, I don't see a reason why I can't play with it.
GPow69 said:Why would you get intel + AMD.....
GPow69 said:It works, but it doesn't work as well It's more efficient to have intel+nvidia or AMD+AMD
Not saying it'll cause problems, but it's less effective overall
Fries said:I myself have an intel processor and an AMD gfx card, haven't had any problems so far.
GPow69 said:Fries said:I myself have an intel processor and an AMD gfx card, haven't had any problems so far.
It WON'T cause problems. But it's less efficient, Why the hell WOULDN'T AMD design their products to communicate better with more of their own products?