True D:GPow69 said:Sucks that this doesn't actually work xD
Panki said:True D:GPow69 said:Sucks that this doesn't actually work xD
I once had that .rar with GTAIV that was only 7MB lol.
Fries said:The reason why this wouldn't work logically is the fact that you lose data through compression. If you compress it many many many times, more data is lost.
An archive within an archive is too unstable.GPow69 said:Fries said:The reason why this wouldn't work logically is the fact that you lose data through compression. If you compress it many many many times, more data is lost.
We need to go deeper.
MiRc34 said:An archive within an archive is too unstable.GPow69 said:Fries said:The reason why this wouldn't work logically is the fact that you lose data through compression. If you compress it many many many times, more data is lost.
We need to go deeper.
Wait if we use some kind of program to make it more stable?Nimphioüs said:MiRc34 said:An archive within an archive is too unstable.GPow69 said:Fries said:The reason why this wouldn't work logically is the fact that you lose data through compression. If you compress it many many many times, more data is lost.
We need to go deeper.
Brb, Rarnobyl.