One-legged man accused of benefit fraud as officials examine wrong leg

Mave

TMS Founder
Administrator
Messages
236,004
Location
Belgium
One-legged man accused of benefit fraud as officials examine wrong leg

A one-legged man was falsely accused of fiddling disability benefit after officials examined his wrong leg.

Robert Punter has undergone a nightmare year of anxiety after being taken to court by benefits officials who told him he was not disabled enough to claim the allowance even though he was having his leg amputated.

The mix up occurred because the 63-year-old ex-trucker, whose left leg was shattered in a boyhood shotgun accident, also suffered a serious toe injury to his right foot.

He was prosecuted when officials found a letter in his medical file showing he had made a full recovery from this operation and accused him of lying about his condition.

He is angry at being treated as a dole fiddler despite battling to overcome his disability and working for 47 years, often in excruciating pain.

Mr Punter, of Bushell Road, Newton Abbot, spent months waiting for his case to be heard at Exeter Crown Court where it was thrown out in less than five minutes.

He denied falsely claiming disability living allowance and Judge Francis Gilbert, QC, recorded not guilty verdicts no evidence was offered by the Department of Work and Pensions.

Mr Punter was wheeled into court by his wife Jean with a white bandage covering the stump of his left leg, which was amputated in January. The judge allowed him to remain in the well of the court because he could not get into the dock.

The case was dropped after defence solicitor Ann Bellchambers obtained a statement from Torbay Hospital consultant Patrick Loxdale confirming that Mr Punter had always suffered from a disability which entitled him to benefit.

After the case Mr Punter said the case arose from a simple misunderstanding.

Source: http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/legged-man-accused-benefit-fraud-officials/story-19682497-detail/story.html
 
Too many things happen because of the officials' lack of patience to check everything properly.
IMHO, those who had reached this erroneous conclusion should at least have a nice part of their salary cut, if they won't be fired...
 
Back
Top Bottom